Another delightfully obvious Picture in Picture as referred to previously. Rear elevation left between the frames.
This again confirms the endoscope evidence, or, if you prefer, the endoscope evidence confirms the effectiveness of the thermal imaging (first floor).
Having had my previous home insulated I felt sure (subjective I know) that the volume of insulation used here was far less than my previous home. However evidence now seems to confirm my suspicions.
The question is, is this typical. As someone mentioned to me this morning and I did myself previously in this journal, is this the next PPI scandal ? One thing is certain, more people already know about this problem than is being acknowledged. I suspect this is the reason that CIGA, the alleged Cavity Insulation Guarantee Agency never answered my polite questions. They realised which way I was heading. As the industry appears to be policing itself, I am not now surprised.
I wonder what the Energy Saving Trust (EST) is making of all this. They must know or ought to know what is going on. Some of their useful PDF data hints at ways and means to detect shortcomings. Ways and means that should be in the fancy looking BBA certificate; all feathers and no meat ?
If the EST is genuinely concerned about conservation, it is perhaps time they emerged from behind this conspiracy of silence and took a lead. I will certainly not give up until I get what I paid for.